Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:41:38 +0300 From: Valentin Nechayev <netch@ivb.nn.kiev.ua> To: Jon Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: LOR (vm object - swap_pager swhash) Message-ID: <20040701084138.GE1085@lucky.net> Resent-Message-ID: <20040701093509.GA48194@lucky.net> In-Reply-To: <40E3CC38.90904@alumni.rice.edu> References: <20040701061818.GA80579@lucky.net> <20040701063105.GA20785@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040701080628.GB80579@lucky.net> <40E3CC38.90904@alumni.rice.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 03:32:56, noackjr wrote about "Re: LOR (vm object - swap_pager swhash)": > >>>>lock order reversal > >> > >>*yawn* :-) > > > >As newer -current is said as too broken, it wasn't got. If > >revolutions round is finished, please say date for moderately calm > >period which can be used for cvsupping. > > I think you misunderstand. This lock order reversal is a frequently > reported false positive. It is harmless. For more information (see LOR > id #1): > http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html Thanks. Whether should be added to `-current FAQ' and posted regularly? > Kris responded with a yawn because he's answered this question so many > times.... It wasn't a question.;) -netch-
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040701084138.GE1085>