Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 00:43:41 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox <v.velox@vvelox.net> To: bala@mataira.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Release Question Message-ID: <20041010004341.02c73919@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <4168BF5A.2050004@mataira.com> References: <41686104.20409@mataira.com> <20041009183626.74f97fb7@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <4168BF5A.2050004@mataira.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 21:49:30 -0700 Balakumar Velmurugan <vbkumar@mataira.com> wrote: > Vulpes Velox wrote: > > >On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 15:07:00 -0700 > >Balakumar Velmurugan <vbkumar@mataira.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >>Hi, > >> We are starting development on a new project that would go > >>production in the fall of 2005. I have been evaluating Release 4.x > >>and 5.x branches for the suitability. Our target platform is AMD64 > >>and AMD32 uni-processor systems. We like most of 5.x features > >except>for its performance and conerns about the availability of a > >STABLE>version in our time window, and I would like your opinion > >to choose>the right FreeBSD version tree to start the development > >right now.>BTW, we dont have any plans to run on SMP architecture, > >our target>platform will always be uni-processor based. Questions > >are,> > >>1. By Sep 2005, do you think 5.x performance will be optimized and > >>be comparable to today's 4.x stable versions ? > >> > >> > > > >Which did you test? Did you turn debugging and ect off? Tried > >5.3beta7 yet? > > > > > > I tried 5.2.1 and havent tried the beta7, yet. Can you tell me, > what is the release tag for beta7 ?. RELENG_5_3_BETA7 didnt work for > me !! Thanks for your pointers. RELENG_5 will get you the newest version of 5x
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041010004341.02c73919>