Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:52:33 -0700 From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Implementing IP_SENDIF (like SO_BINDTODEVICE) Message-ID: <20041027195233.GC770@empiric.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <417FF6D6.4010201@elischer.org> References: <20041027073858.GC719@empiric.icir.org> <417FF6D6.4010201@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 12:28:22PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > >It annoys me that we have to resort to BPF to send IP datagrams on > >unnumbered interfaces. Here is a half baked idea. Please look and > >tell me what you think. > > I've sent lots of datagrams on un-numberred interfaces using netgraph.. I should qualify my post a bit more: I began thinking along these lines with the intention of enabling ISC dhcp (and dhclient) to be compiled without using bpf support. I don't have the time or interest to port ISC dhcp to use netgraph, but I'd be interested to see the results if that happened. BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041027195233.GC770>