Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:41:51 +0200 From: Toomas Aas <toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Replacing both disks in RAID1 Message-ID: <41E696BF.8090704@raad.tartu.ee> In-Reply-To: <41E58EA5.3060903@raad.tartu.ee> References: <41E58EA5.3060903@raad.tartu.ee>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Toomas Aas wrote: > I have a small server running FreeBSD 4.10, 2 x 80 GB drives mirrored o= n=20 > Promise TX2 integrated RAID1 controller. I'd like to replace the 80 GB = > drives with 200 GB drives. >=20 > Here's my current plan: >=20 > 1. Attach one of the new drives to free ICH4 IDE port on motherboard,=20 > partition it and transfer the data using dump/tar. >=20 > 2. Remove the 80 GB drives, attach 200 GB drives (one with data, one=20 > blank) to TX2 IDE ports and re-create the mirror using Promise onboard = > BIOS utility. >=20 > 3. Reboot, fix the fstab (if necessary) and be done with it. >=20 > I have one doubt with it. Currently my partitions are ar0s1a (/), ar0s1= b=20 > (swap), ar0s1e (/var) etc. When I create corresponding partitions on th= e=20 > new drive while it is attached to ICH4 controller, the partitions are=20 > created as ad0s1a, ad0s1b etc. When I then move this drive to TX2 port = > and re-create the mirror the partitions should again be ar0s1a, ar0s1b = > etc. Will it "just work" or will it not work at all? Another thought - maybe I shouldn't create the new array using the=20 Promise BIOS utility, but instead should bring the server up and use=20 'atacontrol create RAID1'? What do you think? Which method has a better=20 chance of success? --=20 Toomas Aas -------------------------------------------------------- |arvutiv=F5rgu peaspetsialist | head specialist on computer networks| |Tartu Linnakantselei | Tartu City Office | ----------------------------------------------------- +372 736 1274
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41E696BF.8090704>