Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 17:14:25 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Idar Tollefsen <idart@performancedesign.no> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: a problem withcompiling kernel Message-ID: <20050512001425.GA70095@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <4282939F.6010504@performancedesign.no> References: <E1DVmZx-000BJ2-00.alexsoldatov-mail-ru@mx2.mail.ru> <4281CA42.6010600@performancedesign.no> <20050511091645.GA25843@xor.obsecurity.org> <4281CF7B.1040501@performancedesign.no> <20050511182745.GA82089@xor.obsecurity.org> <4282939F.6010504@performancedesign.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 01:22:07AM +0200, Idar Tollefsen wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:25:15AM +0200, Idar Tollefsen wrote: > > > >>Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> > >>>>>-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -Werror ../../../net/if_gif.c > >>>> > >>>>..and -Werror is in effect: > >>>>"-Werror > >>>>Treat warnings as errors; abort compilation after any warning." > >>>> > >>>>As I said, try setting > >>>>NO_WERROR= yes > >>>>in make.conf. > >>> > >>>That's the brainless and probably wrong approach :) More intelligent > >>>is to wonder why he's seeing this warning when no-one else is: see my > >>>previous response. > >> > >>Agreed :) > >> > >>However, I seem to recall having had the exact same problem somewhere in > >>the gif code on a 4.x version (some time ago), where simply disabling > >>-Werror was the solution. And yes, I did have INET support in there ;) > > > > > >-Werror is not enabled on 4.x, so it must have again been something else. > > Yes and no. It was 4.x, but not the gif code. It was OpenSSL. > And, as a matter of fact, it was you who closed it: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=54684 > > I hadn't changed any settings prior to that, and it was that > particular problem that made me dig up NO_WERROR. Right, that fell under my other category of "you did something to the source yourself to break it", namely: -Wstrict-prototypes is not enabled on that code by default, so when you turned it on and found that it didn't compile, you should not have been surprised :-) Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050512001425.GA70095>