Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 15:08:31 +0200 From: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Andrea Venturoli <ml.diespammer@netfence.it> Subject: Re: NFS read-ahead? Message-ID: <200505171508.47897@harrymail> In-Reply-To: <4288B1C4.9030806@netfence.it> References: <4286313A.3080102@netfence.it> <9f2h819gnc2938un66cpouvnrbti39adsv@4ax.com> <4288B1C4.9030806@netfence.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2335304.OIJ9jOnrZs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Montag, 16. Mai 2005 16:44 schrieb Andrea Venturoli: > Mike Tancsa wrote: > > Offhand, not really, but if you look around via google for > > mount_nfs freebsd "-r" a lot of people suggest r=3D32768,-w=3D32768. > > Perhaps use that as a starting point and experiment to see what gives > > you the best performance for your situation. > > Tried this: with simple tests it doesn't seem to make any difference. > I guess I'll have to investigate further. > Thanks for now. Try using TCP instead of UDP, this improoved throughput with large files a= =20 lot for me! Even without touching read and write sizes. =2DHarry > > bye > av. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --nextPart2335304.OIJ9jOnrZs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCiezfBylq0S4AzzwRAgmSAJ9KPA+ak873Cv2lpBiK3pMlBCsgrwCfedjy G3oqK3VQH9nRWhljtyyuOW4= =T0KI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2335304.OIJ9jOnrZs--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200505171508.47897>