Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 13:26:47 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> Cc: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>, Max Laier <max@love2party.net>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches) Message-ID: <20050524202647.GA28322@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <42938D40.1050502@incubus.de> References: <3248.172.16.0.199.1116876092.squirrel@172.16.0.1> <20050523211307.GA36552@xor.obsecurity.org> <42924949.1070902@incubus.de> <200505242141.38289.max@love2party.net> <42938C2E.6020301@incubus.de> <20050524201942.GA28257@xor.obsecurity.org> <42938D40.1050502@incubus.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:23:28PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > > But are any IRQs shared? >=20 > Hmm... atapci1 is shared with fxp0 on irq 20.. does fxp0 also require > the giant lock? I don't think so..but the shared interrupt might still be causing some other problem. Try compiling a kernel without fxp support and see if you still have the interactive problems under disk load. Kris --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCk44HWry0BWjoQKURAkbvAJ9dmY1EK5p0eJq5y8CVQK5GvTYJ5gCgjuPT 7lnupUeQqC4JDOecj/1B/Ps= =tZun -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050524202647.GA28322>