Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:29:23 +0100 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD - a lesson in poor defaults? Message-ID: <20160713122923.058ee43e@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <429620683.344.1468405521739@office.mailbox.org> References: <20160713073859.GA88448@localhost.lu> <57860275.404@obluda.cz> <300EEE78-1BF1-460E-ABDD-8EA5C4809941@localhost.lu> <429620683.344.1468405521739@office.mailbox.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:25:21 +0200 (CEST) Simon Krenz wrote: > IMHO I can agree with most of the statements written down in this > text. I can not understand why I need ntpd or sendmail activated in > default installations. ntpd isn't activated by default.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160713122923.058ee43e>