Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:52:12 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Bj?rn K?nig <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de> Cc: Renato Botelho <rbgarga@gmail.com>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] devel/bison: update to 2.0, take maintainership Message-ID: <20050603205212.GB53723@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <42A0B4BE.4040700@cs.tu-berlin.de> References: <200506031829.j53ITTXe028274@data.galle.com.br> <42A0A924.60201@cs.tu-berlin.de> <747dc8f305060312186f393d5d@mail.gmail.com> <42A0B4BE.4040700@cs.tu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 09:51:26PM +0200, Bj?rn K?nig wrote: > Renato Botelho wrote: >=20 > >I didn't know it's not backward compatible, so, I'll make a new patch > >to add bison20 and bison18 ports. >=20 > Well, it's still an assumption. I just wanted to say that it needs=20 > further investigations to deceide if devel/bison can be updated to 2.0.= =20 > Did you? There was enough time since the release of 2.0. If it's concluded that bison 2.0 might be compatible enough to replace the current port we'd need to do a full package build to test that -- there will surely be some ports that still need the old version, but if it's only a handful then the best way forward might be to move the old version to another location and use the new version for everything else. Kris --uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCoML7Wry0BWjoQKURAo48AKDq7O7lrkDJ9uqQKGtfvQ7DWgCHiACeInB9 nDws0fAiuY5T/tiTXfCzkk4= =/rlS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050603205212.GB53723>