Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 21:05:14 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Securelevel 2 VS OpenNTPd Message-ID: <20050604190513.GA84302@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <42A1EE04.1020704@t-hosting.hu> References: <42A1EE04.1020704@t-hosting.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 08:08:04PM +0200, K=F6vesd=E1n G=E1bor wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I'm about to use ntpd to synchronise my server's clock to a time server= =20 > and also provide time server, but I use securelevel 2 that denies to=20 > change the system time with a step greater than 1s. So, I'm afraid it=20 > could work with securelevel 2. Is there any method to get them work with= =20 > each other? ntpd normally changes time in steps much smaller than 1s. The exception is at boottime where it might be necessary to make a large change, but this normally happens before the securelevel is raised. In short, there shouldn't be any problems. --=20 <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050604190513.GA84302>