Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 21:52:13 +0200 From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> To: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches) Message-ID: <42AB40ED.90008@incubus.de> In-Reply-To: <42A77DC3.8060304@incubus.de> References: <4294054C.9080207@incubus.de> <20050525050943.GA64320@xor.obsecurity.org> <42940A81.1030801@incubus.de> <20050525052214.GA76339@xor.obsecurity.org> <42940C87.5000705@incubus.de> <20050525053054.GA76491@xor.obsecurity.org> <4294AB75.9080908@incubus.de> <20050525185427.GB92006@xor.obsecurity.org> <4294CC9A.1000200@incubus.de> <4295153A.9010605@incubus.de> <20050608225141.GA77978@xor.obsecurity.org> <42A77DC3.8060304@incubus.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >> http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/flushbuf.diff >>Does it work for you on 5.4? > The patch seems to work. Cool, that makes a difference like between BTW., is that change being included in 5-STABLE or just for 6-CURRENT? mkb.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42AB40ED.90008>