Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:03:06 -0600 From: Ken Gunderson <kgunders@teamcool.net> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 90nm core opterons scrapped? Message-ID: <20050922160306.56ee6529.kgunders@teamcool.net> In-Reply-To: <433320C2.7020108@bredband.net> References: <20050922104410.30caf3ce.kgunders@teamcool.net> <433320C2.7020108@bredband.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:23:14 +0200 Lars Tunkrans <lars.tunkrans@bredband.net> wrote: > Well they are listed as an existing item . > > punch in 244 in the model number dialouge at: > > http://www.amdcompare.com/us%2Den/opteron/ > > > However they do seem to be a tad old today as the 254 model is > a whole Gigahertz faster > Why do you need them ? > > //Lars Well, yeah, they're definitely faster. Also another $700 each more expensive. I need them for a project and have been waiting on them for 4 months now, each month AMD pushing them out another 30 days. Getting to be freakin' ridiculous! But definitely not very funny. AMD is now telling my distributor that the 90nm cores were NEVER released, wh/I don't find very believable. So I am curious, does anyone have any 90nm cores, or is the AMD guy telling the truth about th CG being the "most recent"? -- Best regards, Ken Gunderson Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050922160306.56ee6529.kgunders>