Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 11:44:30 +0000 From: Volker Stolz <vs@FreeBSD.org> To: Emily Boyd <soc-emily@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Subject: Re: width of #container Message-ID: <20051209114430.GA8314@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4364DB39.7030502@freebsd.org> References: <861x2t280w.fsf@xps.des.no> <434AA5E2.10305@freebsd.org> <20051028110537.M36787@freeman.4gh.net> <4364DB39.7030502@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 09:39:53AM -0500, Emily Boyd wrote: > >>I'm going to take a look at creating a variable width version of the > >>CSS this week - I may have to also change the design of the front > >>page so that it's more suited to variable width. > > > >What is the status of this? The site still appears to be fixed width. > > I'm currently overseas (heading back home today) so will be working on > this once I'm back. It's definitely coming :) I'd like to ping the parties involved, especially on the fixed-width #container. This bites especially if you're running your screen rotated and have a screen-width of physical 768px minus what the browser (Opera) and wm claim as margins. Note 75% won't be sufficient for this (my) setup, I experimented and need at least 78%, I think I'm using a font-size of 14pt, but I'm unsure if this is overriden by CSS or scaled. Somebody already suggested aiming for high values like 95%, which I strongly second. BTW, does somebody know why scaling throught the Large/Small-links doesn't work in Opera, as does neither choosing the style in View->Style? Volker
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051209114430.GA8314>