Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:11:21 -0800
From:      Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ports db a mess after portsnap fetch/update
Message-ID:  <200511141311.21289.kstewart@owt.com>
In-Reply-To: <4378F5EC.5030500@xs4all.nl>
References:  <4378EA8A.4080403@nieser.net> <4378F5EC.5030500@xs4all.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 14 November 2005 12:39 pm, Hans Nieser wrote:
> Hans Nieser wrote:
> .> Hi list,
>
>
> [... huge complaint about stale dependencies ...]
>
> My apologies, in my frustration I sent this out without properly
> investigating, seems all I had to do was install the ports mentioned
> in the pkgdb output about the stale dependencies and run pkgdb -F
> again to fix it for me.
>
> I'm still kind of wondering how it got that way, but at least I got
> it all fixed again without having to do anything drastic like
> pkg_deinstall * _______________________________________________

You can manually build the missing ones. You don't need to deinstall the 
port with the stale dependancy. 

I think portupgrade checks first and then tells you to do the -F update. 
I hit this area at various stages of the gnome_update. The script 
deleted ports and then died before they were added back. The database 
then had loose ends and wanted you to fix them with the -F. The 
-recover option worked most of the time and that was good enough, most 
of the time :). The other 3 or 4 times, I did a manual build of the 
missing port.

Kent

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200511141311.21289.kstewart>