Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 19:01:00 -0500 From: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> To: Patrick Hess <patrickhess@gmx.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quick question: sc(4) vs vt(4) Message-ID: <9946dc9708cdb888a84dc0c0d47e9680@thebighonker.lerctr.org> In-Reply-To: <4379838.Yeri6BbKHa@desk8.phess.net> References: <D20CC2A1.143F43%rpokala@panasas.com> <4379838.Yeri6BbKHa@desk8.phess.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2015-09-02 18:59, Patrick Hess wrote: > Pokala, Ravi wrote: >> Are there any known problems using vt(4) rather than sc(4) on systems >> booting with BIOS? > > Last time I checked, nvidia(4) didn't work with vt(4). Other than that, > I didn't experience any issues that could have been related to running > vt(4) on BIOS-based systems. > > Patrick > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I can use my nvidia driver to get X working with vt(4) as a secondary on my -CURRENT system. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9946dc9708cdb888a84dc0c0d47e9680>