Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:48:09 -0600 From: Chris <racerx@makeworld.com> To: Jose Borquez <bsdlists@sbcglobal.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Nathan Vidican <nvidican@wmptl.com> Subject: Re: Ports vs Packages Message-ID: <439F5DB9.60205@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <439F5C82.9060605@sbcglobal.net> References: <439F3A4D.2060704@sbcglobal.net> <439F4110.5090301@wmptl.com> <439F5C82.9060605@sbcglobal.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jose Borquez wrote: > Nathan Vidican wrote: > >> Jose Borquez wrote: >> >>> When installing the same software using either the ports or a package >>> do they both install in the same locations? For Example installing >>> Apache from ports on one server and installing Apache from packages >>> on another server would still use the same locations for both? >>> >>> Thank you in advance, >>> Jose >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> >> By default, afaik - yes, but that's the short answer ;) >> > What is the long answer? ... try it for yourself and see?! -- Best regards, Chris The label "new" and/or "improved" means the price went up.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?439F5DB9.60205>