Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 21:02:06 -0800 From: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em bad performance Message-ID: <2a41acea0512252102g3faa7e35l6490343431448a78@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43AF660B.1030506@samsco.org> References: <jfvogel@gmail.com> <2a41acea0512220941y61c9b5acs8053e6df8a96a1e4@mail.gmail.com> <E1Eph9s-0002F4-8O@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> <2a41acea0512251114u6cdbb439j3cb6e3ec07f97189@mail.gmail.com> <43AF660B.1030506@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/25/05, Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hmm, not some silly like getting set to half duplex? :) > > > > Jack > > Isn't 'half duplex' meaningless in the gigabit link protocol? > > Scott Yes, but it was meant as a joke, hence the smiley :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2a41acea0512252102g3faa7e35l6490343431448a78>