Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:03:06 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Makoto Matsushita <matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Ruby oddity (pthreads) Message-ID: <1142182986.64145.8.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <441452E7.3010809@jp.FreeBSD.org> References: <20060313.004512.55510725.rushani@FreeBSD.org> <441452E7.3010809@jp.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-PIS9wKi1HVs27X5uwyTq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Makoto Matsushita p=ED=B9e v po 13. 03. 2006 v 01:57 +0900:
> No matter we like it or not, ruby(1) is one of the first priority tools f=
or
> FreeBSD users -- its ports should be stable as much as possible.
>=20
> I've heard from my colleague that dtcps(8) (DTCP server) has affected by =
this
> problem you mentioned. Other problems may coming... so
>=20
> > I would like to see ports/lang/ruby18 will be built without pthreads
> > support by default.
>=20
> Seconded. Since this ports MAINTAINER is ports@FreeBSD.org, if there's n=
o
> applications that requires pthreaded ruby, turn off by default (and on if
> required) would be enough.
I made threaded ruby the default, because the Gtk+/GNOME bindings for
Ruby rely on it being threaded. There are some rather nice apps using
those libraries...
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?
--=-PIS9wKi1HVs27X5uwyTq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBEFFRKntdYP8FOsoIRAtG7AJwNWm27gZ2i8Ff6NATRJ/2qK/nWwACgvO0L
xJrEV38OaPrOwapaqev7jDM=
=b9NE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-PIS9wKi1HVs27X5uwyTq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1142182986.64145.8.camel>