Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:43:27 -0300 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: amd64 slower than i386 on identical AMD 64 system? Message-ID: <200603160743.27519.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <44188D9D.8010801@rogers.com> References: <200603140740.38388.joao@matik.com.br> <20060315211307.GA88339@xor.obsecurity.org> <44188D9D.8010801@rogers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 18:56, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > No, you haven't ruled it out, only that none of the versions you tried > > fix your issue. Note what I said earlier: other people use dual core > > CPUs on FreeBSD/amd64 without stability problems, so it is not a > > general problem with FreeBSD. > > Indeed, they are. The system below is working just fine for me, and the > performance is quite good too (for a pentium4). It's a Supermicro PDSMi > board: > > 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Mar 7 12:24:51 EST > 2006 amd64 > > CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (2793.02-MHz K8-class CPU) > Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0xf62 Stepping =3D 2 > > Features=3D0xbfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PG= E,MC >A,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > Features2=3D0xe43d<SSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,VMX,CNTX-ID,CX16,<b14>,<b15>> AMD > Features=3D0x20100800<SYSCALL,NX,LM> > Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs > real memory =3D 535691264 (510 MB) > avail memory =3D 510017536 (486 MB) > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs > > > I never had any kind of problem with any system with <=3D 2Gb of Ram Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200603160743.27519.joao>