Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:16:52 +0200 From: Lars Heidieker <lars@heidieker.de> To: Darren Pilgrim <darren.pilgrim@bitfreak.org> Cc: Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD is now self-hosting on the UltraSPARC T1 Message-ID: <EC184144-60AB-4F61-8895-48A786AA3E05@heidieker.de> In-Reply-To: <44721E78.2050002@bitfreak.org> References: <1e4841eb0605211854i44c4aa4cm9dfc72506c2232ea@mail.gmail.com> <FB03D201-4154-411E-AFE4-572CEBF76A92@shire.net> <1e4841eb0605221133s428d9136p3d5f7eff964167f4@mail.gmail.com> <2B495EE0-9E81-4CDD-84AF-D3789C9FCB95@shire.net> <b41c75520605221243x37868a3cq9bb57609df7205ad@mail.gmail.com> <20060522195938.GA1267@freebie.xs4all.nl> <44721E78.2050002@bitfreak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 22 May 2006, at 22:26, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > Wilko Bulte wrote: >> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 09:43:11PM +0200, Claus Guttesen wrote.. >>>>>>> on topic, the Opterons aren't SMP either, and neither are the >>>> ht-Xeons... >>>>>> ... >>>>> The MultiProcessor Opterons are _NOT_ SMP, they are _NUMA_ >>>>> machines, >>> Not really related to the original topic any longer, is it? >> Decent bikesheds never are.. > > At least people are being polite and not messing up the threading > by changing the subject header. :) > Yes that would be extremely NUMA because of the latencies occurring with such a thread migration ;-) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEcsT1cxuYqjT7GRYRAhXZAJ9YGIW279AByboC9V4VRnYG78pprwCguRWR E9GIqAo+y9AeNulP2rMcX5o= =xW9J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EC184144-60AB-4F61-8895-48A786AA3E05>