Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:53:51 -0400 From: "Zaphod Beeblebrox" <zbeeble@gmail.com> To: "Eugene M. Kim" <freebsd.org@ab.ote.we.lv> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Subject: Re: dump(8) performance Message-ID: <5f67a8c40605310953h27bf170oa474200cd4b93c03@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <447DBA44.1060605@ab.ote.we.lv> References: <447DB0B1.8040206@ab.ote.we.lv> <20060531153029.GE6982@dan.emsphone.com> <447DBA44.1060605@ab.ote.we.lv>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/31/06, Eugene M. Kim <freebsd.org@ab.ote.we.lv> wrote: > > Dan Nelson wrote: > > Are you using the -C option to dump? I would expact that to help more > > in the "dumping directories" step, but it might help later phases too. > > Yep, -C32. I'm a pretty big fan of using team (ports/misc/team). Team implements a ring buffer for the output of dump. Is the -C argument an output buffer or a buffer at some other level of the process?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5f67a8c40605310953h27bf170oa474200cd4b93c03>