Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:08:28 +0100 From: RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Word processor for 6.1 Message-ID: <200609051408.30090.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> In-Reply-To: <44FD36C4.7090509@locolomo.org> References: <10609040708.AA17675@pluto.rain.com> <10609042328.AA20234@pluto.rain.com> <44FD36C4.7090509@locolomo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 09:35, Erik Norgaard wrote: > In the standard-supfile for the base system you'd specify RELENG_6 which > means you'll get head of -STABLE, or if you are conservative RELENG_6_1 > which means that you'll just get security patches to the 6.1 release. I do wish people wouldn't give inexperienced users the impresssion that running 6-stable (RELENG_6 ) is the norm - this is a development branch.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200609051408.30090.list-freebsd-2004>