Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 15:18:15 +0100 From: CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl> To: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.0-RC4 AMD64 binutils / arm-eabi-binutils locales conflict Message-ID: <CAFYkXj=wjs_jyyqSh-hkV4OVYrskh6CvFE_24FkxQBTAPhDOpA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44sit2a5hl.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <CAFYkXjnQyadkYnZY8pjSKvMexw03mNFASUy4RV1aavG=ukyxEw@mail.gmail.com> <44sit2a5hl.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl> writes: > >> There still is a conflict of binutils and arm-eabi-binutils in binary >> packages / ports - they install locale files into same destination. >> This blocks ARM development and/or other tools that depends on >> binutils. Please note that binutils are also dependency of various >> other packages (i.e. openjdk). > > I'd have to check what I did at work, but I think I just used a > different PREFIX to install to a different place. My cross-compile > build system needs the tools specified in environment variables > anyway, so I don't even need to adjust my path. The problem is with the package installation, binaries are installed correctly, only some localization files are blocking and makes binutils/arm-eabi-binutils exclusive.. Otherwise build works fine with no environmental variables/changes :-) Best regards :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFYkXj=wjs_jyyqSh-hkV4OVYrskh6CvFE_24FkxQBTAPhDOpA>