Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:04:43 -0500 From: Craig Boston <craig@feniz.gank.org> To: Teufel <bsd@kuehlbox.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: gjournal and Softupdates Message-ID: <20060912220442.GA75667@nowhere> In-Reply-To: <45070EE6.3090104@kuehlbox.de> References: <45066E19.2040405@kuehlbox.de> <ee5vat$fcb$1@sea.gmane.org> <ygfirjto0z2.fsf@dominion.borderworlds.dk> <ee64n4$it$1@sea.gmane.org> <ygfac55nwyd.fsf@dominion.borderworlds.dk> <45070EE6.3090104@kuehlbox.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 09:47:50PM +0200, Teufel wrote: > Well, thats why i actually don't find journaling filesystems very sexy. > So the question is, if it is still safe to use fsck on a gjournal > enabled FS ? Well, if you just want to check, you can take a snapshot and run fsck -n on it. That will at least tell you if there's any problems that need to be dealt with. Running fsck on a journal-enabled UFS should be safe modulo the usual requirements (not mounted, which probably means single-user mode). Craig
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060912220442.GA75667>