Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:59:30 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: nfe: can not cvs sources anymore! Message-ID: <20061119235930.GA6345@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <4560C80E.7020402@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <4560657A.9000002@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20061119161749.GB31926@rambler-co.ru> <4560A1A5.4050500@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20061119201341.GA1381@xor.obsecurity.org> <4560C80E.7020402@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 10:09:34PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 07:25:41PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > > =20 > >> Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >> =20 > >>> On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 03:08:58PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > >>> =20 > >>> =20 > >>>> Hello. > >>>> Using these two sources for getting nfe() driver support for my Free= BSD > >>>> 6.2-BETA/AMD64 box was pretty convenient in the past weeks due to my= big > >>>> interrupt problems using the nve() driver. > >>>> But with yesterday, I can't get the sources anymore. nfe() isn't yet= a > >>>> part of the 6.2 BETA, that's what I looked first for, so can anybody > >>>> help me out? Is nfe() a part of 6.2-REL in the near future or are th= ere > >>>> other reasons stop spreading the sources via that cvs source? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks for your help in advance, > >>>> > >>>> =20 > >>>> =20 > >>> Did you try the version at > >>> http://www.se.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~shigeaki/software/freebsd-nfe.html > >>> ? I use it and except for some peer-to-peer gigabit problems I > >>> didn't notice any other bad signs. It's far more stable that > >>> what we have now in the CVS tree. > >>> > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> =20 > >>> =20 > >> Thank you for the link. > >> No, I did not try this link since I thought the CVS tree's version was > >> the stabelst version we have. I find it convenient by pushing it via n= et > >> using cvs just after I upgraded my CVS tree of the sources for the > >> operating system. I will keep this link in mind. > >> Is there a date we can this driver expect in FreeBSD 6.2? Or is the > >> driver more subject to be merged in 6.2-STABLE and for 6.3? nve() isn't > >> suitable, neither with SCHED_ULE (which I use now again) and with > >> SCHED_4BSD, because on my hardware platform the interrupt generation is > >> much higher than that of the nfe() driver - and due to this massive > >> interrupts useless for me. > >> =20 > > > > Please remember to turn off SCHED_ULE before submitting any and all > > future bug reports, thanks :-) > > > > Kris > > =20 >=20 >=20 > Well, yes, I do this, and as I wrote above, the problem ist even worse wi= th SCHED_4BSD. And SCHED_ULE is now my defaukt, beacause FreeBSD 6.2-PRE/AM= D64 ADN i386 is as freezing for short periods of times as never seen before= ... Even with the above driver? Kris --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFYO/iWry0BWjoQKURAhO2AKDgFHDYWVPCknSEjOdaTjRYReDI3gCg1kcN Xd0Ab7PVGJBlARL6yk4Db74= =0H6p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061119235930.GA6345>