Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:07:30 -0600
From:      Eric Anderson <anderson@freebsd.org>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
Subject:   Re: UFS2 with SAN
Message-ID:  <45D21A82.7000900@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <45D20DA0.4050600@elischer.org>
References:  <45CD6FF5.8070007@freebsd.org>	<20070213075627.63126.qmail@web34502.mail.mud.yahoo.com>	<6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2204C9DAB4@ms05.mailstreet2003.net>	<a969fbd10702130839j727d055bu10c3ec80e38d2a3d@mail.gmail.com>	<6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2204C9DAB5@ms05.mailstreet2003.net>	<6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2204C9DAB6@ms05.mailstreet2003.net>	<45D1F30A.6080403@freebsd.org>	<eqsut3$6a3$1@sea.gmane.org> <45D20037.1040102@freebsd.org> <45D20DA0.4050600@elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/13/07 13:12, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Eric Anderson wrote:
>> On 02/13/07 12:09, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>> Eric Anderson wrote:
>>>
>>>> You might look at tdfs (fuse module from Ivan Voras I believe).  It's
>>>> probably horribly beta (not knocking it Ivan - I'm sure it's an amazing
>>>> start), so lots of testing would need to be done.  It's also most likely
>>>> not high performance.
>>> Yes, I'm realistic about it - it is "horribly beta" :)
>>>
>>> Two reasons: one: I couldn't amass enough interested parties to help
>>> test it (and possibly work on it), and second: while it's a nice problem
>>> to tackle, I don't [yet] need it that badly to start working on it
>>> outside of free time). In any case, TDFS doesn't have locking because
>>> FUSE doesn't have it (or didn't when I started doing it), so it stays
>>> single-writer-multiple-readers until that changes.
>>>
>>> I'm thinking of re-creating it in kernel mode (and in this form it could
>>> also have locking) but not any time soon. Maybe during the summer (SoC?
>>> probably.).
>>>
>>
>> I've thought about this too - and even thought about making it a file 
>> system layer, like nullfs, with a network-kernel piece to notify the 
>> readers of changes, etc.  I'm not certain if it would work or not..
> 
> it will be very interesting to see the outcome from Matt's cluster 
> filesystem on Dragonfly.


Is it actually being developed?  Last I checked, there was talk, but no 
code.. :(


Eric



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45D21A82.7000900>