Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 01:27:01 +0200 From: "Georges Discry" <murmex@gathex.net> To: "Howard Goldstein" <hg@queue.to> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thunderbird 2, OpenLDAP 2.3 and X11BASE migration Message-ID: <64234c8f0705011627m31cfe434s5c250bfa46a66c6e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4637C332.1080704@queue.to> References: <64234c8f0705011332w16c8fc80re0b2df0774b594@mail.gmail.com> <4637AE4E.5090102@queue.to> <64234c8f0705011425g229822e4r58d5af20f0872a77@mail.gmail.com> <4637C332.1080704@queue.to>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2007/5/2, Howard Goldstein <hg@queue.to>: > Georges Discry wrote: > > 2007/5/1, Howard Goldstein <hg@queue.to>: > >> Georges Discry wrote: > >> > I've just met a problem with those two ports. > >> > In fact, Thunderbird includes /usr/local/include, which is the > >> > location of two header files of OpenLDAP : lber.h and ldap.h > >> > The problem is that Thunderbird already has those files, so during > >> > compilation, instead of including its own files, it includes > >> > OpenLDAP's. > >> > >> Same prob, same config here (xorg 7.2, /usr/local X11BASE). I don't use > >> ldap and got away with adding > >> MOZ_OPTIONS+= --disable-ldap > >> to the Makefile. > > You probably have something that installed ldap.h and lder.h in > > /usr/local/include/. Just check, I'm sure they are there. > > Oh yes I can confirm that they're there, openldap2.3 seems to come along > as a default option with something that came in in the gnome metaport. I > figured that's why you were posting to -gnome list instead of -mozilla? I posted here mainly because the maintainer of the Thunderbird port is gnome@freebsd.org. And yes, openldap2.3 is one of the Gnome packges's depency. > > >> Do you have /usr/X11R6 symlinked to /usr/local? If so, can you attach > >> files to outgoing messages more than once without it coredumping? > > Yes I've symlinked /usr/X11R6/, but this is a fresh install > > In fact I've just finished the compilation (yup, right now). I'm > > giving it a try... > > > > Well, I touched 2 files and attached them to a mail and sent it > > without a crash. However it hung several seconds when I attached them. > > This was driving me absolutely bonkers as this is a production machine > (I know...) until I pulled the symlink. If there's any good news it's > that everything seems to run fine at this site but only without the > symlink. The hanging led without fail to a coredump emitting somewhere > out of the pthreading package. Are you on 6.2-STABLE on an i386? At > least one -CURRENT user running x.org 7.2 reported no problems with this. Yup, 6-2-STABLE on an i386 with X.org 7.2 from git.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?64234c8f0705011627m31cfe434s5c250bfa46a66c6e>