Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 02 May 2007 09:53:01 -0700
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        attilio@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: msleep() on recursivly locked mutexes
Message-ID:  <4638C1ED.5020607@elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <4638BF32.5040607@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200704262136.33196.hselasky@c2i.net> <200704270748.49404.hselasky@c2i.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0704270906001.8536@sea.ntplx.net> <200704271917.29939.hselasky@freebsd.org> <46323A77.8010907@elischer.org> <4638BF32.5040607@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Attilio Rao wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
>> Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>
>>> First of all: Where is FreeBSD's locking strategy document? 
>> It is just started.. man 9 locking.  it needs a lot of work still.
> 
> I'm working with rwatson@ about a document that can nicely fit in 
> locking(9), but we are a little bit stuck in terminology.
> In order to not confuse even more locking consumers we are trying to 
> find right and unique terms for kernel events linked to locks.
> 
> 
> Attilio

send me what you have :-)
I'll look at it too.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4638C1ED.5020607>