Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 06:56:20 -0000 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> To: "Roman Kurakin" <rik@inse.ru> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEDSUP: man -k cleanup (man -k RAID, some bits are missing) Message-ID: <cb5206420705182331l547a425dy4ddea24f54f232cc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <464A1366.3050809@inse.ru> References: <4649E0AD.4060705@inse.ru> <464A03E3.4040805@freebsd.org> <464A1366.3050809@inse.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/16/07, Roman Kurakin <rik@inse.ru> wrote: > Eric Anderson wrote: > > On 05/15/07 11:32, Roman Kurakin wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Trying to obtain information about supported RAID devices in > >> the system via `man -k RAID` I've found that not all known > >> by me devices are there. So a grep-ed a bit and going to commit > >> the following patchset. I think that keyword RAID should present > >> in description of all these man pages. But may be I am wrong? > >> > >> There is also some bits I was not able to fix. > >> 1) Is it safe to s/Array/RAID/ in ida(4)? > > > > I don't think that's good - an array isn't necessarily a RAID, and a > > s/r of that name yields bad results. > I am about brief description (.Nd) only. If driver supports some RAID > arrays it > should be marked as such. So may be "Array" => "Array (including RAID)" > in .Nd? We usually keep .Nd as short as possible. It's a pity apropos(1) uses it exclusively for its lookups, but I don't believe that's a good excuse for stuffing keywords, tags and comments into the field.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420705182331l547a425dy4ddea24f54f232cc>