Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 13:05:51 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> To: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Olivier Mueller <om-lists-bsd@omx.ch>, d@delphij.net Subject: Re: suggestion: force removal and reinstallation of eaccelerator on php upgrade Message-ID: <20070606130551.03fcb684@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <4666634F.5050405@FreeBSD.org> References: <1181058492.30278.5.camel@bigapple.omnis.ch> <1181059134.4722.2.camel@charlie.delphij.net> <4666634F.5050405@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_S_GGpVl4lfo2XqUD8Ku7cQR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 09:33:35 +0200 Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Xin LI ha scritto: > > I usually use "portupgrade -fr lang/php5", but I think it may > > worthy to just bump PORTREVISION across PHP upgrade. >=20 > Every php extension (optimizer, pecl, accelerator and so on) needs to > be recompiled after updating base PHP. I cannot bump all ports when > php4 or php5 is updated, be serious :-)=20 Why ? We did this in the past for enough ports, we do it for claws-mail-*, etc. --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" --Sig_S_GGpVl4lfo2XqUD8Ku7cQR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGZocGBX6fi0k6KXsRAr6DAJwKpaCYlCGzcBhvvSPi+uVzwJ3mcQCdFVfs xr5gs9aNqYS3jPePdNFGNyw= =FZPu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_S_GGpVl4lfo2XqUD8Ku7cQR--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070606130551.03fcb684>