Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:36:40 +0300 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> To: cokane@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Gary Corcoran <gcorcoran@rcn.com> Subject: Re: Overlap in PCI memory ranges Message-ID: <475CD068.70600@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <47594C1F.8070103@FreeBSD.org> References: <475897DB.1010308@FreeBSD.org> <4758B6E8.7030502@rcn.com> <4758BEAB.6020306@FreeBSD.org> <4758D544.5060405@yandex.ru> <47594C1F.8070103@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Coleman Kane wrote: > Also, the mem resources of the SATA controller are used for AHCI > (however, PATA compatibility mode is supported using the port ranges, > which is what the controller is forced to do). In addition, the device > name string on the SATA controller is only there because I've been > fooling with ata-chipset.c (to unsuccessfully attempt to get AHCI > working). Reading the MMIO registers in AHCI mode seems to produce Do you have some patches for ata(4)? I don't see in the clean sources where driver can allocate a memory resources for the ATI. As i see from your dmesg driver doesn't use AHCI. > situation (a single port SATA controller on a laptop). This is supposed > to read a bitmap of the enabled ports on the SATA controller. Please, show your `pciconf -l`. And if you have some patches, show their. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?475CD068.70600>