Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:30:41 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Alan Amesbury <amesbury@umn.edu> Subject: Re: UCD-MIB for bsnmpd? Message-ID: <20080131143041.pzb4k77xtgkw8oc0@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <479F825A.9040200@quip.cz> References: <478FBC91.1060606@umn.edu> <479F5CF4.4020000@umn.edu> <479F825A.9040200@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> (from Tue, 29 Jan 2008 =20 20:45:30 +0100): > Alan Amesbury wrote: > >> Alan Amesbury wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>> I'd like to run bsnmpd, but need the UCD-MIB for other performance >>> monitoring. I could run net-snmp and proxy requests through it to >>> bsnmpd, but that strikes me as inelegant. There's a bsnmpd-ucd module >>> at Google >>> >>> =09http://bsnmp-ucd.googlecode.com/ >>> >>> >>> which is seems to work, except for some minor bugs in what it reports >>> for laLoadFloat.[123]. Have any of you experience with this? Are there >>> plans to add it to the ports tree? >> >> [snip] >> >> Since no one else responded to this thread, I'm assuming I'm the only >> one using this feature... at least on *this* list. :-) For what it's >> worth, v0.1.3 appears to work as expected. I've been able to narrow >> down some performance problems on one of my systems. (It appears to be >> dropping packets when traffic exceeds ~120Kpkts/sec, vs. its near twin >> which seems fine at ~190Kpkts/sec). >> >> It'd still be nice to get bsnmp-ucd into the stock ports tree, though, >> as I think other people might eventually benefit from it. Should that >> request be done through a PR? >> >> As always, thanks in advance! > > I am not using bsnmp-ucd so I will not help you with problems. If you > want it in the ports tree, I think the best way to do it is contacting > the author of bsnmp-ucd to ask him to do the port / submit it (by PR) > to the official ports tree. Or you can do it your self and submit it > and be the maintainer of the port. > Once it hits the ports tree, it gets better attention and bugs will be > (can be) fixed faster. People with a strong interest in seeing this in the base system could =20 also contact syrinx@ and/or harti@, as they take care about bsnmpd. Bye, Alexander. --=20 We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on when it's necessary to compromise. =09=09-- Larry Wall http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080131143041.pzb4k77xtgkw8oc0>