Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:39:40 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@freebsd.org> To: Juraj Lutter <wilbury@gmail.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> Subject: Re: buildkernel problem with RELENG_7 Message-ID: <20080411213940.GA27222@eos.sc1.parodius.com> In-Reply-To: <47FFD7D4.5010007@gmail.com> References: <47FFC509.5050502@gmail.com> <a31046fc0804111340n10c8abf9y51c4ffcea37f574c@mail.gmail.com> <47FFD7D4.5010007@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:27:48PM +0200, Juraj Lutter wrote: > On the other hand, aren't those uninitialized variables potentionally a > "bug"? Potentially, yes, but not guaranteed. The existing -STABLE tree emits a very large number of warnings. I'm a strong advocate of using -Werror (treat warnings as errors), and I've always wondered why the -STABLE tree didn't default to this behaviour. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080411213940.GA27222>