Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:44:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com> To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD Message-ID: <20040630184252.L66769@carver.gumbysoft.com> In-Reply-To: <48048559-CA69-11D8-8BDD-003065A70D30@shire.net> References: <36u63c$231i65@mxip07a.cluster1.charter.net> <20040629103106.gpw4kwscsg88k0c8@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> <48048559-CA69-11D8-8BDD-003065A70D30@shire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > Does -CURRENT actually have this in it now? A while back the emulation > stuff needed to run x86 binaries while in amd64 FreeBSD was not part of > CURRENT and the comments were that it was too unstable... I was told it works. Its possible there is some rtld wierdness still, but static binaries should work. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040630184252.L66769>