Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 03:48:13 +0200 From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@FreeBSD.org> To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Johan Hendriks <Johan@double-l.nl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SAMBA 3.0.28a and CVE-2008-1105 Message-ID: <7d743c270807021848r3c51559dw766fc249f873bc50@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <485B9283.2050008@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <485A5939.1090108@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20080620075113.A44833@gwdu60.gwdg.de> <485B674B.9010404@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCB5DDF1F@w2003s01.double-l.local> <485B9283.2050008@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 1:20 PM, O. Hartmann <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Johan Hendriks wrote: >> >>>> Konrad Heuer wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, O. Hartmann wrote: >>>> >>>>> We still have Samba R3.0.28a in the ports but regarding to >>>>> CVE-2008-1105 shouldn't it be R3.0.30? >>>> >>>> As far as I know the mentioned security patch gets applied when Each new version of Samba has it's own bugs, so I prefer not to commit 0 day release versions, but wait, until it's got proven to be stable enough. Again, there are talks about 3.0.31 release due some new fixes... *sigh* With regards, Timur.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7d743c270807021848r3c51559dw766fc249f873bc50>