Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:54:25 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Tim Traver <tt-list@simplenet.com> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: 7.0 CPU and Memory Performance Message-ID: <48A31FD1.8080306@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <48A31E84.2080502@simplenet.com> References: <48A1F379.2040805@simplenet.com> <alpine.BSF.1.10.0808130939100.70092@fledge.watson.org> <48A310D7.50005@simplenet.com> <48A31812.30908@FreeBSD.org> <48A31E84.2080502@simplenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tim Traver wrote: > > Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Tim Traver wrote: >> >>> Is there anything that I can do on this latest 7.0 box that might be >>> useful information??? >> Someone will need to repeat this under controlled conditions. It's >> quite a surprising result. >> >> Kris > Kris, > > If you can outline a procedure for me, I might be able to do these tests > for you, as I still have the 5.4 disk available. > > Couple of things though...I'm not sure what code base the 5.4 box had on > it...I could maybe update the src and recompile the kernel. > > I would probably have to have someone else take a look at exactly what > ubench is doing, and if it is indeed a test that makes sense to > use...anyone? > > Once I am finished, I would assume you would need things like dmesg > output, the compiling conf parameters, etc...tell me what would be good... > > If this is not controlled enough, then you might have to have one of the > performance team do it I guess... > Robert outlined the steps that need to be done to begin with. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48A31FD1.8080306>