Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:11:39 +0100 From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@FreeBSD.org> To: Giulio Ferro <auryn@zirakzigil.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NATT patch on current Message-ID: <20090116101139.GA19489@zeninc.net> In-Reply-To: <49688A88.4080503@zirakzigil.org> References: <49685F15.7080605@zirakzigil.org> <20090110100357.GB2718@zeninc.net> <49688A88.4080503@zirakzigil.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi. The netipsec.c patch should not have been present, it has probably been generated either by a manipulation error from myself or by some race condition between a svn up and a svn diff to produce the patch. Please test the following patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~vanhu/NAT-T/patch-natt-test-TRUNK-2009-01-16.diff It also have updated values for INP_ESPINUDP* flags, so you DO NEED to also recompile ipsec-tools !!! The patch has been generated from a new svn diff, so it will apply cleanly. It seems to compile, but I could NOT test it as I have strange compilation issues with some other part of kernel's sources (in ata/atapci/chipsets, on which I do not have any modifications...), even with a tree without modifications and a GENERIC kernel... If that patch is ok, I'll remove soon the previous patch (http://people.freebsd.org/~vanhu/NAT-T/patch-natt-test-HEAD-2008-07-21.diff) as it contains at least one wrong patch. Yvan.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090116101139.GA19489>