Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:31:01 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <eitanadlerlist@gmail.com> To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>, "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@tutopia.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?) Message-ID: <496A8F45.7010400@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4969CC6D.6030707@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <61484.71762.qm@web32708.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20090111044448.GC5661@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <4969CC6D.6030707@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I never took care about GPLv2 and v3 > differences but know, this seems to come to relevance in some way. I don't seem to understand this. Why should gpl v3 affect the OS? The output of the compiler isn't affected by the license. Is it? -- Eitan Adler "Security is increased by designing for the way humans actually behave." -Jakob Nielsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?496A8F45.7010400>