Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 19:38:53 -0400 From: matt donovan <kitchetech@gmail.com> To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, wenheping@gmail.com, cy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: screen and tmux should be listed under the same category Message-ID: <28283d910905161638w5f7e5f54gcd16ef29f0f0b0b6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A0F35C7.7060703@p6m7g8.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905161134510.50084@FGD135.localdomain> <4A0F35C7.7060703@p6m7g8.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Philip M. Gollucci <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>wrote: > Josh Rickmar wrote: > > GNU screen is listed under sysutils, while tmux is listed under misc. > > Shouldn't the two at least be in the same category, since they both do > > the exact same thing? (tmux is even designed to be a BSD-licensed > > replacement for screen.) > > > Does anyone have any thoughts on tmux vs screen ? the NO_PACKAGE in > screen has been annoying me for years now if I can find a good > replacement I'm so there. > > > tmux does not work inside the shell due to sc. But in X it works wonders.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28283d910905161638w5f7e5f54gcd16ef29f0f0b0b6>