Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:52:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: Gary Gatten <Ggatten@waddell.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD & Software RAID Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905271651550.52163@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <4A1CD688.4020604@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <4A1AA3DC.5020300@network-i.net> <200905261238.52979.kirk@strauser.com><70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793ED91@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> <4A1C3725.8040509@infracaninophile.co.uk> <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793ED94@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> <4A1CD688.4020604@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> ZFS should work on i386. As far as I know there aren't any killer bugs that > are architecture specific, but I'm no expert. Unless your aim is to learn unless someone assume than size of pointers are 4 bytes, and write program in C, there will work as good in 64-bit mode and in 32-bit mode.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0905271651550.52163>