Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:22:14 +0200 From: "Paul B. Mahol" <onemda@gmail.com> To: Michael Gmelin <freebsdusb@bindone.de> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New patchset for acpi_wmi/acpi_hp Message-ID: <3a142e750906301122j792fb80qeb07783cbf8ea1c2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A49E411.1060509@bindone.de> References: <4A48DEB8.1040808@bindone.de> <83012DEA-D524-49CA-A8D2-6B03E69C4ED5@freebsd.org> <4A49E411.1060509@bindone.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/30/09, Michael Gmelin <freebsdusb@bindone.de> wrote: > Rui Paulo wrote: >> >> On 29 Jun 2009, at 16:33, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> please find attached more patches against CURRENT of today. These >>> patches include the patches I've sent on the 27th. Everything points they do not. >> >> Committed, thanks. >> >> -- >> Rui Paulo >> > cool thanks, this should be pretty stable and clean enough so I don't > expect any changes besides adding supported hardware to the man page in > the near future (keeping my fingers crossed :) > For some reason patches used for this commit do not have anywhere "verbose" sysctl in code, and cat /dev/hpcmi doesnt work for me using code from CURRENT. Better side of story is that acpica no longer complains about DTD. Sorry, I really should noticed and reported this much before ... -- Paul
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3a142e750906301122j792fb80qeb07783cbf8ea1c2>