Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:14:36 -0500 From: Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: Olivier SMEDTS <olivier@gid0.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> Subject: Re: Disable root mount waiting for USB Message-ID: <1248786876.73923.6.camel@balrog.2hip.net> In-Reply-To: <4A6EF8CD.7070305@icyb.net.ua> References: <367b2c980907270358g45a2497dh64c2734721c44fca@mail.gmail.com> <200907281232.13359.hselasky@c2i.net> <4A6EDFA6.9060204@icyb.net.ua> <200907281415.47203.hselasky@c2i.net> <4A6EF8CD.7070305@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 16:10 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 28/07/2009 15:15 Hans Petter Selasky said the following: > > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 13:23:18 Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 28/07/2009 13:32 Hans Petter Selasky said the following: > >>> Added a sysctl for this: > >>> > >>> http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=166673 > >> Nitpick: better/cleaner to make it a tunable, doesn't make sense to have it > >> as r/w sysctl. > > > > Feel free to change it once the patch gets into -current. I've sent my > > patchset off, and cannot change this right now. > > Hans, > maybe I am mistaken but I think that without TUNABLE_INT declaration or > TUNABLE_INT_FETCH/getenv_int call the sysctl variable won't be set from kernel > environment, so this sysctl will be effectively useless. That was my thinking... I don't think that sysctl will be handled in time to be effective. robert. -- Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1248786876.73923.6.camel>