Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:03:54 +0000 From: Maslan <maslanbsd@gmail.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: sosend() and mbuf Message-ID: <319cceca0908041003o4c313bf6qff57a1f0b752b537@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A786302.3090709@elischer.org> References: <319cceca0908030119i3432a495ya60aa431dab0e1b1@mail.gmail.com> <86k51k4kvl.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86fxc84ksj.fsf@ds4.des.no> <200908040138.14743.max@love2party.net> <319cceca0908040227hf9a0f92jbf05b11e9f974994@mail.gmail.com> <20090804093036.GN1292@hoeg.nl> <319cceca0908040239k2accd7fen402db4c91687a267@mail.gmail.com> <4A786302.3090709@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> kernel threads may not have a file descriptor table. > so kern_open may not work on kernel processes.. > (just speculating) But the module's main thread belogs to proc, why this process could use kern_open() and proc0 don't
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?319cceca0908041003o4c313bf6qff57a1f0b752b537>