Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:10:19 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster is not always recursive Message-ID: <4A8AEE8B.2010002@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4A8A6B20.1030100@quip.cz> References: <4A89CB20.3000408@quip.cz> <4A89CD0E.7010106@FreeBSD.org> <4A89D7FD.8080106@quip.cz> <4A89FA80.8090308@FreeBSD.org> <4A8A6B20.1030100@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> I have seen similar problem in the past with amavisd-new + spamassassin
>>> and their dependencies, but it is much bigger and complicated tree of
>>> dependencies and I have not evidence recorded for it.
>>> Reported case with jpeg / gd / png is the simplest one I have seen.
>>
>>
>> Were these other cases also with the -r option, or were they when
>> doing "regular" upgrades?
>
> It was with regular upgrade, if I remember it well, but it was some time
> ago... I'll track it better next time (if it occurs).
If it's failing on a regular upgrade I start to suspect weirdness in
your local setup since that's a dead-simple thing that would be very
hard for portmaster to get wrong. I'm also suspicious because I took a
look at the code a couple times yesterday and even using -r each port
should still be getting the full treatment, which includes upgrading
dependencies as needed.
I will however put some more time into testing it today and get back
to you.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A8AEE8B.2010002>