Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:08:50 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Rainer Goellner <rgoellner@gmx.de> Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/138571: [lor] LOR on 8.0-BETA3-AMD64 Message-ID: <200909091508.50274.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4AA7F323.1060304@gmx.de> References: <200909061837.n86IbqMI071582@freefall.freebsd.org> <200909081312.16421.jhb@freebsd.org> <4AA7F323.1060304@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 2:25:39 pm Rainer Goellner wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Sunday 06 September 2009 2:37:52 pm linimon@freebsd.org wrote: > >> New Synopsis: [lor] LOR on 8.0-BETA3-AMD64 > >> > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=138571 > > > > The bufwait/dirhash one is a known false-positive. > > > Nice to read. Hopefully the other one, starting with > ufs/bufwait/ufs, is as harmless... > > BTW, Norbert Koch sent something quite similar on > freebsd-current. I think the ufs/bufwait/ufs one might be harmless as well. That is, it should be ok assuming that softupdates doesn't result in deadlocks by creating cycles of the files it touches. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200909091508.50274.jhb>