Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:29:41 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: PJ <af.gourmet@videotron.ca> Cc: Johan Hendriks <Johan@double-l.nl>, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: glabel clarification Message-ID: <6201873e0910190729v12f66335xe93d0c83a0ee7aee@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4ADC772F.3060303@videotron.ca> References: <4ADC6D89.10600@videotron.ca> <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCBA57086@w2003s01.double-l.local> <4ADC772F.3060303@videotron.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:26 AM, PJ <af.gourmet@videotron.ca> wrote: > Yes, this is true and that is why I thought that glabel would work; I am > trying to set up my computers with identical clones that I can update > with changes on the master machine from time to time and thus prevent > data loss in case of problems. So I use ad12 as the main system; if it > were to crash I would then boot from ad6 which is identical. But the > /etc/fstab is identical in both machines. So if I boot from ad6, I will > get booted from ad12 ... so that doesn't work. It looks like we need an > unique identifier for each disk. > Why not use gmirror? -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6201873e0910190729v12f66335xe93d0c83a0ee7aee>