Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 01:17:03 +0100 From: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: whats best pracfive for ZFS on a whole disc these days ? Message-ID: <CDDD6384-E5B8-49ED-A23E-3B716239468C@lassitu.de> In-Reply-To: <4AFF4211.3040206@gsoft.com.au> References: <E1N2NcA-0004c4-CE@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> <200910271902.19618.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20091027104316.dsp7kikkoogo80gw@www.goldsword.com> <200910281112.06300.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <493EE416-62CE-4EA4-81A7-8F802789D5DD@lassitu.de> <4AFF40B1.3040705@gsoft.com.au> <4AFF4211.3040206@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 15.11.2009 um 00:49 schrieb Daniel O'Connor: > It would be nice if the man page mentioned this case though, currently = the "zpool replace" entry covers the case where the new disk has the = same device node. Huh? > zpool replace [=E2=80=90f] pool old_device [new_device] >=20 > Replaces old_device with new_device. This is equivalent to = attach=E2=80=90 > ing new_device, waiting for it to resilver, and then = detaching > old_device. Stefan --=20 Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> Fon +49 151 14070811
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CDDD6384-E5B8-49ED-A23E-3B716239468C>