Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:34:17 -0600 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> To: Juraj Lutter <otis@sk.FreeBSD.org> Cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new porstnap mirror Message-ID: <20091211163417.GB33056@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <4B2266AE.1050705@sk.FreeBSD.org> References: <59adc1a0912110158j156706d7m1fa7b25002f61edb@mail.gmail.com> <a78074950912110216y240d0d1br36d2b3a4e1e69768@mail.gmail.com> <59adc1a0912110732v515346eeq4ce82830f5b75618@mail.gmail.com> <4B2266AE.1050705@sk.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--eJnRUKwClWJh1Khz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 04:35:10PM +0100, Juraj Lutter wrote: > Dimitar Vasilev wrote: >>> =20 >> I'm located in Bulgaria and to be honest one user asked. >> So far my regular patients are a news agency, 2-3 private hospitals, some >> Turkish government servers, 2-3 telcos >> and the regular FBSD bunch - 100-200 local people plus the various stray >> bunch from around the world. >> We will see how it goes. >=20 > Just my $0.02, I often install machines in local offices connected via= =20 > 1-to-2 Mbps ADSL lines and fetching snapshot at speed like 100kB/s is not= =20 > really good to look at ;-) On an internal network it's possible to have a single machine do the fetch and then share /var/db/portsnap via read-only nfs. This will be much more bandwidth efficent than maintaining an actual mirror. -- Brooks --eJnRUKwClWJh1Khz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFLInSHXY6L6fI4GtQRAtA7AJ97Nyy9YqedM2bnjJMcVfXHj2VOkwCfQhi4 JyQRwqJMa44SeBET0QhfNW8= =I6CG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eJnRUKwClWJh1Khz--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091211163417.GB33056>