Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:20:58 +0100 From: Alexey Shuvaev <shuvaev@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> To: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, autotools@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Puzzled about gettext dependencies Message-ID: <20100211202058.GA98543@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> In-Reply-To: <4B7463A8.2020003@netfence.it> References: <4B71F590.6020807@netfence.it> <7E6CF823-C3DA-42B8-B2D7-6C440C1EFF6C@mac.com> <20100210122140.GA70802@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> <4B7463A8.2020003@netfence.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 09:08:08PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Il 02/10/10 13:21, Alexey Shuvaev ha scritto: > > >The port autodetects the presence of these libraries and drags them in. > >Taking a closer look at this it turned out that aDe@ has dropped > >maintainership of what is referred to as 'autotools'. Not good :( > > > >What follows is just an attempt to fix the problem, however it doesn't :) > >and it seems that the port deserves more attention. > > > >A little bit more than 0.02$, > >Alexey. > > Thanks Alexey. > > I admit I didn't try your patch, since you said in advance it doesn't work. > > I really haven't understood whether this is a bug (or feature) in > gettext or autotools (autoconf?). > > Should I fill a PR in? > Yes, it is non-critical bug in devel/gettext.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100211202058.GA98543>