Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:43:39 +0100 From: Rafal Jaworowski <raj@semihalf.com> To: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 174731 for review Message-ID: <BFFB13AC-463F-4300-AA4E-C8D475BA5303@semihalf.com> In-Reply-To: <4B79954D.1060909@freebsd.org> References: <201002151753.o1FHrUEx061091@repoman.freebsd.org> <4B79954D.1060909@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2010-02-15, at 19:41, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > Rafal Jaworowski wrote: >> http://p4web.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=3D174731 >>=20 >> Change 174731 by raj@raj_fdt on 2010/02/15 17:53:15 >>=20 >> Refactor and optimize FDT infrastructure. >> =09 >> - Extend 'compatible'-related routines so that we can do strict >> checking i.e. if a node is only compatible with a single = entry. This >> is required for nodes like 'simple-bus' as sometimes other = nodes >> claim their compatibility and we need to have a way to = identify such >> cases. >> =09 > These 'compatible' routines would be very useful in the regular OF = case as well. Any change you could move them into ofw/openfirm? No objections from me; for sure the ofw_ versions can be placed there = (note there are also 'early' versions of these routines, prefixed fdt_, = for cases when OFW i/f is not available yet, and these are ratehr = FDT-specific interest I guess). Rafal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BFFB13AC-463F-4300-AA4E-C8D475BA5303>